L'ETCAF et le Système de Justice
There is no translation available.

R. v. Linklater, 2012 YKTC 68 (Lilles J.)

Guilty pleas of Aboriginal offender to theft, breach of probation, threatening, obstruct justice – 30 yo offender with 60 convictions – more time in jail than out of jail – much of offending behaviour related to supporting alcohol and drug addictions – traumatic and tumultuous formative years – grandparents and great-grandparents residential school survivors – personal history and performance characteristics strongly suggest possibility of FASD, no formal assessment – ample evidence of intellectual functioning disorder, immature, impulsive and antisocial – numerous reports indicating that FASD testing should be undertaken, two court requests, no assessment done – number of professionals determined that full FASD assessment including identification of weaknesses and strengths on which to build programming and learning is essential for rehabilitation – further psychological report ordered by court sets out more detailed information about limitations – significant obligation on justice community because of previous failures to respond appropriately – 18 months for obstruct – 4 months CSO for other offences, more time in jail would add nothing to rehabilitation and deterrence – no programming in jail, would amount to locking him up for the sake of locking him up.